Business Services

Eminent Domain

At Roetzel, we actively guide clients through the complexities of eminent domain (also known as condemnation), where government agencies acquire private property for public use without the owner's consent. Our attorneys leverage their comprehensive understanding of eminent domain law to secure the best possible outcomes for our clients.

Our team has extensive experience representing property owners, commercial tenants, and appropriating authorities in eminent domain proceedings. With offices in Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, and Toledo, we are uniquely positioned to address any eminent domain issue across Ohio, offering local expertise supported by a large firm's resources.

We also handle regional and national cases for large retail businesses, coordinating with local counsel to streamline the process for clients frequently impacted by roadway projects.

Our Experience

  • Representing a publicly traded petroleum company in eminent domain cases throughout Ohio regarding the taking of property on its convenience-store fuel centers 
  • Representing national retail pharmacy chain in numerous eminent domain cases throughout the United States 
  • Representing national automotive parts chain in numerous eminent domain cases throughout the United States 
  • Won a $3.7 million settlement for the owner of a golf course in an eminent domain case arising from a highway construction project in Licking County, Ohio
  • Won a $970K jury verdict for a property owner in an eminent domain case involving a road grade separation project in Delaware County, Ohio
  • Won a jury verdict in excess of $1 million for property owner in an eminent domain grade separation case in Cuyahoga County, Ohio
  • Successfully represented retail pharmacy, a commercial tenant, in an eminent domain case arising from a highway project in Clark County, Ohio
  • Successfully represented publicly traded electric utility company in eminent domain actions involved in the construction of a large-scale electric transmission line in Geauga County, Ohio; the project required the acquisition of easements across 87 parcels of real estate
  • Successfully served as Special Counsel to the Ohio Attorney General in eminent domain cases
  • Successfully represented an electric utility company in eminent domain cases in Delaware, Madison, Clark, Erie and Union Counties related to the construction of major utility facilities
  • Successfully represented a four-year state university and several two-year state community colleges in eminent domain and land acquisition proceedings

What We Do

FOR PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OWNERS

  • Plan pre-litigation strategies and manage fund withdrawal
  • Analyze property and business damage 
  • Consult expert witnesses 
  • Negotiate settlements and manage mediation, trial, and appellate processes

PROPERTY VALUATION

  • Assess commercial, investment, industrial, residential, and undeveloped properties
  • Collaboration with appraisers, land planners, accountants, and engineers

FOR COMMERCIAL TENANTS

  • Statutory and contractual rights representation in eminent domain actions

FOR APPROPRIATING AUTHORITIES

  • Represent public and private entities in property acquisition for public projects

Related Media & Events

  1. Alerts
    Ohio Court Defines When Property Owner in Eminent Domain Case Can Pursue Appeal - Sep 23, 2024
    Ohio Court Rules Property Owner Can Recover Attorney Fees When Eminent Domain Case Is Dismissed by the Taking Authority - Aug 19, 2024
    Substitute Version of Bill in Ohio House That Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law Recently Accepted by Committee - Feb 20, 2024
    2022 Bill in Ohio House That Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law Reintroduced in 2023 - Mar 28, 2023
    Ohio Eminent Domain: Supreme Court Opens Door for Agencies to Pay Less Compensation Through “Appraisal Shopping” - Jan 9, 2023
    U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Expands Its Controversial 2005 Kelo Decision - Jul 6, 2022
    New Bill in Ohio House Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law - Jun 14, 2022
    U.S. Supreme Court Decides Important Regulatory Taking Case In Favor of Property Owners - May 12, 2022
    Court Rejects Use of Eminent Domain for Recreational Trail - Apr 21, 2022
    U.S. Supreme Court Expands Definition of What Constitutes a Physical Taking - Apr 14, 2022
    U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Private Company Can Exercise Federal Condemnation Authority Over State-Owned Land - Mar 3, 2022
    The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Will Increase Eminent Domain Activity—Get Ready - Feb 2, 2022
    What is a ‘Quick Take’ in Eminent Domain Law? - Oct 13, 2021
    Can I Challenge the Authority of a Condemning Party in Ohio? - Oct 5, 2021
    What Do I Need to Know About Eminent Domain Compensation? - Sep 24, 2021
    What Are the 3 Types of ‘Takings’ for Eminent Domain Cases in the US? - Sep 14, 2021
    What Are My Constitutional Rights for Eminent Domain Appeals in Ohio? - Aug 20, 2021
    Can I Appeal My Eminent Domain Case in Ohio? - Aug 12, 2021
    Federal Court Excludes Evidence of Stigma Damages in Eminent Domain Case Involving Gas Pipeline - May 13, 2020
    Ohio Eminent Domain: Appellate Court Gives Condemning Authorities Green Light to Appraisal Shop in order to “Low Ball” Pre-Suit Offer - Mar 5, 2020
    Roetzel’s Eminent Domain Group Wins $1.2 Million Jury Verdict for National Retail Client - Feb 12, 2020
    After Knick, A Property Owner Can Remove an Eminent Domain Case to Federal Court, Right? Not so Fast! - Jan 6, 2020
    New Ohio Decision Clarifies Role of Judge and Jury in Eminent Domain Cases - Feb 2, 2017
    Pipeline Companies Win Key Battles in War for Eminent Domain Rights - Sep 19, 2016
  2. Articles
    U.S. Supreme Court Decides Landmark Condemnation Case in Favor of Property Owners - Fall 2019 - Columbus Bar Lawyers Quarterly
    U.S. Supreme Court Decides Landmark Condemnation Case in Favor of Property Owners - Jul 25, 2019
    "Walking the Fine Line: Code Enforcement and the Fourth Amendment" - Jan/Feb 2019 - Municipal Lawyer Magazine
    "Reasonable Expectations: What can your city attorney do for you?" - Nov/Dec 2018 - Quality Cities
    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms "Paying Quantities" Ruling Against Local Producer - September 2018 - Ohio Gas & Oil
    Ohio Appellate Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under the 2006 Dormant Act - May 2018 - Ohio Gas & Oil
    Ohio Federal Court Rules in Landowner Royalty Case - Apr 1, 2018 - Ohio Gas & Oil
    Statute of Limitations in Lack of Production - Mar 1, 2018
    School district's eminent domain plan may hinge on "necessity" definition - Aug 5, 2016 - CBA Today
    Take It If You Dare: Ohio's New Economic Development Eminent Domain Law - Jan 27, 2006
  3. Podcasts
    Show Me the Money! The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act! - May 3, 2022
    Jeremy Young on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act - May 3, 2022
  4. Firm News
    100 Roetzel Attorneys Named 2025 Best Lawyers®, “Ones to Watch” - Aug 15, 2024
    15 Roetzel Attorneys Named Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch - Aug 17, 2023
    Roetzel & Andress Earns Recognition in 2024 Best Lawyers - Aug 17, 2023
    Steve Jones Quoted in Sandusky Register Article on Potential Effects of Proposed Roundabout - Feb 18, 2023
    Roetzel & Andress Named to 2023 “Best Law Firms” List - Nov 3, 2022
    Nine Roetzel Attorneys Named “Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers® 2023 - Aug 18, 2022
    Roetzel & Andress Named to 2022 “Best Law Firms” List - Nov 4, 2021
    74 Roetzel Attorneys Named 2022 Best Lawyers in America®; 18 Recognized as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch - Aug 19, 2021
    23 Roetzel Attorneys Named 2020 Ohio Super Lawyers®; 11 Named Rising Stars® - Nov 27, 2019
    Roetzel & Andress Names Michael Scotti III to Lead National Business Litigation Practice Group - Jan 18, 2019
    Roetzel Promotes Resetar and Young to Shareholder - Feb 16, 2018
    Ohio State Bar Association Program Helps Cultivate Leaders in Legal Profession - Jun 17, 2016